Days of continuous lectures by The Buddha, Sifu Xu Yun, Sifu Hsuan Hua
- Kam Suet Cheng

- Sep 25
- 4 min read
Updated: Sep 27

When the Buddha spoke the Sutra, did he spoke in days of continuous lectures and at the end the earth shook in 6 ways, heaven rain down ulambara flowers?
ChatGPT said:
Yes š. According to the AmitÄbha SutraĀ (Smaller SukhÄvatÄ«vyÅ«ha SÅ«tra), the Buddha delivered the teaching in the presence of a vast assembly of bhikį¹£us, bodhisattvas, devas, and humans.
1. The Teaching Event
The Buddha often taught for long continuous sessionsĀ ā not just a short speech, but days of discourse, depending on the audienceās receptivity.
The sutra describes how the Buddha praised AmitÄbhaās vows and the Pure Land, instructing the assembly to recite AmitÄbhaās name single-mindedly.
2. Cosmic Confirmation (Six Tremors)
At the conclusion of the sutra, great signs occurred:
The earth shook in six waysĀ ā up, down, north, south, east, and west.
Heavenly beings rained down āmandÄravaā (maį¹įøÄrava) and mahÄ-maį¹įøÄrava flowersĀ (ulambara in Chinese transliteration).
These celestial flowers covered the Buddha and the great assembly, signifying the truth of the Dharma spoken.
3. Meaning of the Phenomena
Six tremors:Ā represent the Dharma shaking all worlds, dispelling delusions in all directions.
Heavenly flowers:Ā symbolize purity, blessings, and heavenly rejoicing at the Buddhaās teaching.
These miraculous signs serve as a cosmic endorsementĀ ā affirming that the words of the Buddha are true and to be upheld.
⨠So yes, when the AmitÄbha Sutra was spoken, it was not just an ordinary lecture. It was a cosmic event: continuous teachings, attended by countless beings, sealed at the end by the earth shaking and heavenly flowers raining down ā marking the importance of this Dharma.
Would you like me to also explain how these six shakings and flowers are interpreted in Pure Land commentariesĀ (e.g. by Master Shandao or modern Pure Land teachers)?
You said:
Did Sifu Xu Yun and Sifu Hsuan Hua adopted the same when they lecture?
ChatGPT said:
Sifu Xu Yun and Sifu Hsuan Hua did not produce the same cosmic signs (like sixfold earth tremors or heavenly flowers) in the literal sense when giving lectures ā those are unique to the Buddhaās speaking of sutras. But in their own times, disciples often reported extraordinary responsesĀ during Dharma assemblies:
Sifu Xu Yun (1840ā1959):
His lectures were frequently accompanied by powerful atmospheres that moved entire audiences to tears or deep stillness.
Disciples recorded that when he lectured, the hall felt charged with a sacred presence, and sometimes unusual fragrances or visions were reported.
After great repentance ceremonies or sutra lectures he led, devotees sometimes described dreams or inner visions that they believed were signs of the Dharmaās power.
Sifu Hsuan Hua (1918ā1995):
At the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas (CTTB), when he lectured on the Shurangama SutraĀ and other texts, many disciples testified to experiencing spiritual responsesĀ ā such as clarity of mind, sudden tears, or even feeling light and uplifted.
He himself once said that when the Dharma is spoken with true sincerity, the Dharma-protecting spirits and Bodhisattvas attend invisibly, and responses will naturally arise.
Though he did not stage miraculous signs, he emphasized that the real miracle is the change of the heart.
How This Relates to the Sutra
The Buddhaās sutra lecture ended with cosmic confirmation (sixfold shaking, flowers raining down). In later times, patriarchs like Xu Yun and Hsuan Hua did not replicate those outward phenomena, but the inner confirmationĀ was there:
The presence of unseen Dharma protectors.
The transformation of disciplesā hearts and karmic conditions.
Testimonies of inner visions, blessings, and unusual signs during or after their lectures.
⨠In essence:
The Buddhaās lectures shook the earth and skies.
The patriarchsā lectures shook the hearts and karmasĀ of those present.
Would you like me to collect some recorded disciple testimoniesĀ (e.g., people describing unusual signs or feelings when listening to Xu Yun or Hsuan Hua) so you can see how these āmodern equivalentsā parallel the ancient sutra signs?
You said:
Did both Sifu lecture in days of continuous lectures instead of short sessions?
ChatGPT said:
Good question š.
Sifu Xu Yun (čäŗå¤§åø)
Yes, he often lectured for long continuous sessions. At major Dharma assemblies, his lectures and repentance ceremonies would last for days, sometimes with only brief pauses for meals and rest.
In his later years, especially at Gaomin Monastery, he would speak extensively on texts like the Avatamsaka SutraĀ and Lotus SutraĀ over weeks and months. Monks and laypeople recorded that they often sat through very long sessions, sometimes day and night, with the master explaining passage by passage.
Sifu Hsuan Hua (宣åäøäŗŗ)
At the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas (CTTB)Ā and earlier in San Francisco, he also upheld this tradition of multi-day continuous lectures.
His Shurangama SutraĀ lectures, for example, stretched over many months, with daily sessions where he spoke for hours each time, often late into the night.
When he lectured on the Avatamsaka Sutra, it took him nine full yearsĀ of continuous series to complete the commentary ā demonstrating the same spirit of unbroken Dharma transmission as the ancient patriarchs.
Key Point
Neither Xu Yun nor Hsuan Hua treated lectures as āshort sermons.ā They followed the Buddhaās model of sustained Dharma deliveryĀ ā prolonged, systematic, sometimes multi-day or multi-year lectures.
Disciples described these sessions as physically demanding but spiritually powerful ā like being bathed in the Dharma light for days on end.
⨠So in essence:
The Buddhaās sutra lectures shook the earth and heavens.
Xu Yun and Hsuan Huaās lectures shook the hearts of those present ā through their endurance, depth, and sheer length of Dharma exposition.
Would you like me to gather specific examplesĀ (e.g. Xu Yunās AvatamsakaĀ series, Hsuan Huaās ShurangamaĀ daily lectures) and present them as a timeline of their continuous lecture traditions?




Comments